Unspillable.com

OIL DISASTERS Kill, Lastest, News, Static

A few nice BP OIL SPILL images I found:

BP Oil Spill Vigil

Image by Aldrin Bulayo

BP Oil Spill Vigil

Image by Aldrin Bulayo

BP Oil Spill Vigil

Image by Aldrin Bulayo

OIL DISASTERS spill, Vigil

Question by Dark Helmet: Abortion = Immoral?
First off, I tend to vote Democrat and could not be more against the Iraq War. Visit some other discussions on this site. You’ll see that I have big issues with conservative political policies. Secondly, Lawful does NOT = Right nor does it = correct! Your argument for relative morality I will agree does make sense on a grand scale. Peoples’ sense of morals can differ and still fall within the acceptable societal norm. However, for specific issues, morals are not relative, but concretely static! One of those morals is the right to live your life without it being intentionally taken away from you by another human being. Imagine your reaction if you were having a discussion with someone and they told you, with all sincerity, that they didn’t think killing or ending human life was morally wrong. Would you consider this person moral? Would you still talk to this person? My bet is that you would not. An overwhelming majority of people would think that this person was off their rocker and would avoid them like the plague. Furthermore, I still get a kick out of fellow debaters trying to discount my argument because they say I’ve based my belief on my religion. I have done no such thing (I haven’t gone to church regularly in years). I’ve used deductive logic, with science and the basic moral principle that I just mentioned above concerning right to life as my benchmarks, to form my conclusion. Science tells us that at conception, a living human cell is formed. It begins a process called mitosis, which is the process of cell division, or growth. Science also tells us that dead cells cannot divide and grow. If these cells are human cells, and they are growing, then from the above we can logically conclude that we do, in fact, have human life. And if we can, from above, mutually agree that human life has the right to complete their existence without being eliminated in an intentional way (society’s basic agreement on right to life), then we can conclude that abortion is morally wrong. It’s not a hard argument to follow. I do appreciate your history lesson with regards to the Courts rulings (I’m aware of the Court’s rulings, thank you), but again, they don’t really apply in our discussion unless you’re arguing that they’ve ruled on morality here. Which by the way, contradict your entire argument. I never argued that abortion was illegal, or that women didn’t have the legal right to have them done. What I did was say they didn’t have the moral right. What I did was call them immoral, based on irrefutable scientific fact, an irrefutable and binding societal contract to not end human life, and deductive reasoning. That’s actually ironic when you think about it. Here we have, as I said above, far left liberals arguing ethics and moral standards when it comes to economic and political matters, such as minimum wage fairness, characteristics of the free market, CEO golden parachutes, gaps in compensation between the elitists and proletariats, and desired government intervention during the oil price surge ( just to name a few). Yet, they can’t see how their own argument and position in this discussion is violating the most basic societal contract. There’s HUGE inconsistency on the left when it comes to a discussion about morals. But the real kicker is this: while there are pro lifers out there that are whacked and clearly have gone off the deep end, many pro lifers cite the same arguments I have, and we get accused of trying to set up a sectarian form of government to push our religious beliefs. And on the other hand, you have the pro choicers who contend that life doesn’t begin until birth. Of what are they basing that on in this MORAL argument? Science rejects their claim. So what then are they basing it on? The only thing that’s left is…faith.

Best answer:

Answer by James K
I didn’t read much of that, all I know and I swear by this, is that in China they have birth control, families are only allowed to have one child and if they have a second one they get taxed heavly.

As a result they do late abortions in their hospitals, and for nutrients they eat the baby or FEATOUS!

SICK! look at some of the scenes on there, type in eat abortion and china and then re-think!

Give your answer to this question below!

OIL DISASTERS Abortion, immoral

by annieb

Question by Alan G: Is it still illegal to build a geothermal power plant in Colorado? In your state?
I used to live in Colorado and at tat time I learned in Ecology class, geothermal power plants were illegal because, ” they are unfair competion for conventional power plants”.
Conventional power plants were; coal, natural gas, petrolium, powered plants.
Have the laws changed?

Best answer:

Answer by bud68
I think you “learned” wrong.

Add your own answer in the comments!

GEOTHERMAL ENERGY build, colorado, geothermal, illegal, Plant, Power, State, still

www.thescienceofgettingrich.biz Be On Page One of Google, Expose The Truth & Be The Coolest Guy On The Planet. About This Video To Watch this video in higher quality go to www.youtube.com and bookmark www.peacebud.com BONUS Watch Peace Bud: ‘War On Terror Introduction’ THANK YOU… — Post as many Video Responses as you possibly can and let the world now that you want to Legalize Hemp NOW. — This series explores everything you will ever need to know about the cannabis plant. According to a 1975 government study, hemp was discovered to be effective in the eradication of cancer. This 8 part series exposes the truth about pot induced creativity. Hope you enjoy it and please subscribe if you want more… Best Video Responses From Individuals Like You: ‘Run From The Cure: The Rick Simpson Story’ (Canadian’s Government Cover up. Conclusive Evidence that Hemp Oil Cures Cancer and other diseases) www.youtube.com

The Conspiracy Show With Richard Syrett is an exciting new weekly one hour TV series (26 x 47 min) engaging debate, passionate guests & intelligent probing on grand questions of public interest. Richard Syrett is a 20-year broadcast veteran with a vast & loyal fan base. His Richard Syrett Show, The Conspiracy Show & his guest hosting of Coast to Coast lit up audiences throughout North America. Conspiracy theory, paranormal events, unexplained mysteries, secret archaeology & suppressed science, are now mainstream subjects. Yet, no TV series gives viewers a high quality presentation of these great, ongoing, debates. Until now. Richard Syrett brings accessibility & encourages smart debate, with passionate guests about such subjects as: – 9/11 – health secrets – shadow governments – life after death – Presidential election secrets – alternative energy – forbidden archaeology – assassinations – suppressed science – life in other dimensions www.TheConspiracyShow.com Your viewers explore unedited interviews, supporting docs, episodic critical thinking guides, links to ongoing debate & study, then connect back to your site. CONTACTINFORMATION TV sales 1 (416) 988 0926 Starfield Releasing: HYPERLINK “mailto:gpjcreative@rocketmail.com” gpjcreative@rocketmail.com Non-theatrical sales: Bill McGowan 1 (888) 665 4121 DISTRIBUTION ACCESS Bill.McGowan@ctv.ca
Video Rating: 4 / 5

FUEL, ENERGY CONSPIRACY THEORIES Conspiracy, Hemp, peace, Premiere